Legal Opinion

Merchants National Bank v. Davis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1937No. Appeal, 80PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The Act of June 16, 1836, P. L. 755, makes no provision for judgment by default for want of an appearance against a garnishee in attachment execution. The same is true as to foreign attachments under the Act of June 13, 1836, P. L. 568. It has, however, been held .in decisions under these acts that such judgment is proper as a general legal consequence of the failure to answer. See Layman v. Beam, 6 Whart. 181; Jones v. Tracy, 75 Pa. 417; Longwell v. Hartwell, 164 Pa. 533. But it appears that the judgment here entered is improper. It should not have been entered against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Layman v. BeamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Longwell v. HartwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Jones v. TracySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of New Jersey v. CoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. In Re Trust Under Will of ArensSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. Ind. Elec. Assoc. of NJ v. NJ Bd. of Exam.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. State v. LemonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API