Legal Opinion

Danielson v. Miller

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1965No. 7683PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE L. ZIMMERMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant has appealed from an order, after judgment but prior to service of notice of appeal, of the district court approving an item of defendant-appellee’s cost bill in the sum of $25.50 representing the expense of the original copy of the plaintiff-appellant’s deposition taken by the defendant-appellee prior to trial.

Plaintiff-appellant does not contend that the lower court has no authority at all to award court costs upon the taking of a deposition but argues that the judicial statutory authority to award court costs is limited by statute in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Davis v. SeversonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hamman v. Clayton Municipal School District No. 1New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. GAC Finance Corp. v. RubidoeauxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunleavy v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hughes v. WestNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API