Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Respondent seeks to dismiss this appeal on the basis that it is premature. The motion is granted.

Appellant was tried and convicted in absentia of unlawful use of the telephone. His counsel filed notice of intent to appeal the conviction. Appellant has not been apprehended since the trial, and the sentence remains sealed.

A criminal defendant may not appeal until final judgment. State v. Hubbard, 277 S. C. 568, 290 S. E. (2d) 817 (1982). Judgment in a criminal case is not final until sentence is imposed. Ex parte Murray, 261 S. C. 255, 199 S. E. (2d) 718 (1973); State v. McKettrick, 13 S.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HubbardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Ex Parte MurraySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. HightowerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  4. Ex parte Tolson v. LintonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1850
  5. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. ArtherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. ArtherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API