Legal Opinion
State v. Lakeside
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 1, 1976No. C 75-06-1977 Cr., CA 5263PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction of escape in the second degree, ORS 162.155. 1
At trial defendant raised the defense of lack of criminal responsibility per ORS 161.295. 2 Contrary to the wishes of defendant, the trial court instructed the jury that:
"Under the laws of this State, a defendant has the option to take the witness stand to testify in his or her own behalf. If a defendant chooses not to testify, such a circumstance gives rise to no inference or presumption against the defendant, and this must not be considered by you in determining the question of guilt or innocence.”
Defendant took…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Villines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- State v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. LakesideOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. AminiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. AminiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.