Legal Opinion

Cosper v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1952No. 33850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. Special ground one of the amended motion for a new trial complains that the court erred in charging the following: “I charge you, gentlemen, that even though you may find from the evidence that the defendant railroad company violated an ordinance of the City of LaGrange by going over the railroad crossing at a rate of speed over eight miles an hour, that such violation, while it constituted negligence as a matter of law, that such violation would not authorize a recovery on the behalf of the plaintiff, unless such violation was the proximate cause of the accident. Before you would be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Platt v. Southern Photo Material Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Veazey v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Pennington v. Rowley Bros.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  5. Porter v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Teague v. KeithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  2. Southern Railway Company v. Mrs. Nora B. JolleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Southern Railway Company v. Mrs. Nora B. JolleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API