Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Salt Lake City Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1986No. 19481PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs sought to compel the defendant to provide water service. From a judgment of dismissal of their complaint in the district court, plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs applied for water service to their leased premises and tendered the required deposit of $50.00. The defendant denied their application based upon the provisions of Salt Lake City, Utah, Rev. Ordinances § 49-6-1 (1981), which require the property owner to sign the application for water and agree to be ultimately responsible for payment for all water provided. The owner of the property, plaintiffs’ landlord,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. County Water System, Inc. v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. BellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Amax Magnesium Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. LoughtonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Provo City v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API