Legal Opinion

Hastings v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 21, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-1713PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

This ease is before this Court on remand from the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. United States, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 732, 122 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993). 988 F.2d 1280 (D.C.Cir.1993). Plaintiff in this case, Alcee Hastings, an impeached federal district court judge, claims that the United States Senate used improper procedures during his impeachment trial. See Hastings v. United States, 802 F.Supp. 490 (D.D.C.1992). On September 17, 1993, this Court vacated the Senate’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Hastings v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SER Margaret L. Workman v. Mitch Carmichael, as President of the SenateWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. NOVANT HEALTH, INC. v. AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021
  3. SER Margaret L. Workman v. Mitch Carmichael, as President of the SenateWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API