In re Vicksburg Bridge & Terminal Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, District Judge.
This matter has now to be considered on the application of a large number of committees, attorneys and other persons for payment of expenses alleged to have been incurred for the benefit of the estate, and also for fees or compensation for services claimed to have been rendered. The names
*231of the persons and amounts claimed are as .follows:
Expenses Compensation
Chicago Bondholders' Committee ............................. 48,566.09
Attorneys for Chicago Com..... : 85,000.00
R. Miles Warner, Scc'y......... 6,312.50 18,750.00
Lambert & Hart, Attorneys.... 33.85 500.00
City…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Paramount-Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- In Re New York InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- In Re Paramount Publix CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In Re Consolidated Motor Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Straus v. Baker Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greensfelder v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940