Legal Opinion

First Bank of Marietta v. Mascrete, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1997No. 1996-0907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 503.] FIRST BANK OF MARIETTA, APPELLEE, v. MASCRETE, INC. ET AL.; ROSLOVIC & PARTNERS, INC., APPELLANT. [Cite as First Bank of Marietta v. Mascrete, Inc.,

1997-Ohio-158.] Civil procedure—Contempt hearing may be considered a trial for purposes of a Civ.R. 59 motion for new trial—Proceeding is considered a trial for purposes of Civ.R. 59 when indicia of trial substantially predominate in the proceeding. 1. A contempt hearing may be considered a trial for purposes of a Civ.R. 59 motion for a new trial. 2. A proceeding is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. L.A. & D., Inc. v. Board of Lake County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. First Bank v. Mascrete, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. North Royalton Education Ass'n v. North Royalton Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. In re the Arbitration between Ionian Shipping Co. & Tyson Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Brown v. CoffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roberts v. Columbus City Police Impound DivisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API