Fleming v. State

Appellant was charged with receiving stolen goods and was convicted after a jury trial and sentenced for a term of one to ten years.

On this appeal appellant first contends the evidence was insufficient to show that the automobile tires here in question, received by appellant, were stolen goods but rather that the same were embezzled property and that the verdict is therefore not sustained by sufficient evidence.

*390The affidavit here charged appellant, in substance, with feloniously buying, concealing and aiding in the concealment of eight new automobile tires which had been unlawfully stolen by…