Legal Opinion

Colvin v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

The plaintiff Colvin brought this action against the State Industrial Accident Commission, seeking compensation for an injury under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained and the complaint was dismissed. Plaintiff appeals.

Since, on demurrer, we must assume the truth of the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint, we will recite them in narrative form.

Plaintiff and Ms employer were under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The plaintiff suffered injury by accident, arising out of and in the course of his employment, by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Stark v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Dondeneau v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Lindeman v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. International Mortgage Trust Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beier Glass Co. v. BrundigeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. Buell v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Coombs v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Billings v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Peters v. Briggs & SonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API