Legal Opinion

Hoock v. Sloman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1906No. Docket No. 70PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Brooke, J. Bill by Henry Hoock against Adolpb Sloman and Lottie T. Sloman for the foreclosure of a mortgage. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Complainant filed his bill for the foreclosure of a mortgage given by defendants upon certain real estate situated in Wayne county. Defendants filed a *20joint and several answer, neither admitting nor denying the allegations of the bill of complaint, but leaving complainant to his proofs. To this answer a replication was filed. No notice was given under the statute for an examination of witnesses in open court. The cause came on to be heard March 5,1904. The proofs were taken in open, court, defendants objecting thereto on the grounds that the case stood for hearing on pleadings alone, as no…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoock v. SlomanMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Barnes v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Weber v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Joseph Galvin v. William H. Jennings, Individually and Trading as Poison Pete's TavernCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API