Bailey v. Schubert
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
The bill in this case was filed on May 15, 1956, as a bill in the nature of a bill of review, seeking to have the *663court correct an error alleged to be apparent on the face of tbe record in a previous Chancery canse tried in that court and being correctly identified by reference to the previous style of the case and the number, etc.
The decree in the case sought to be reviewed and corrected was where it is alleged that an error was made of using fourteen hundred feet rather than one hundred and forty poles. Thus it is obvious that there would be some discrepancy in the length of the distance of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hurt v. LongTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Murphy v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Fourth & First National Bank v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
- Johnson v. MurphyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bolan v. CaballeroTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
- McDade v. McDadeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- Jones v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007