Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 3, 1986No. 85-542PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari to review the following question:

In a criminal case, is a defendant precluded from claiming error in the trial court's failure, in its oral charge, to instruct the jury on a particular matter because the defendant failed to file any written requested instruction?

To answer this question, we must consider the application of Temporary Rule 14, Ala.R.Crim.P., which provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

"No party may assign as error the court's giving or failing to give a written instruction, or the giving of an erroneous, misleading, incomplete, or otherwise improper oral…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Ex Parte WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Giles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. City of Birmingham v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Reynolds v. McEwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Ex Parte State of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Connolly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Bogan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API