Legal Opinion

Shawmut, Inc. v. American Viscose Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 16, 1951PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. H. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff in an action now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts seeks to have Arthur Malina and Malina Company (hereinafter referred to as Malina) and Saul Gutner and Gutner Brothers Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Gutner), none of whom is a party to the action, adjudged to be in contempt of court for failure to comply with subpoenas duces tecum.

Cross-motions have been made by Malina and Gutner (deponents) to limit the taking of depositions by oral examination and to modify the subpoenas. Plaintiff and deponents…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Geisler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Bowles v. WilkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Certain Complaints Under Investigation by an Investigating Committee of Judicial Council of Eleventh Circuit. v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Horizons Titanium Corporation v. Norton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
  4. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. The United States. American President Lines, Ltd. v. The United States. Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. v. The United States. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. Ghandi v. Police Department of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API