Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Anthony Frank Fizzinoglia

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 2015No. 173PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In this administration proceeding pursuant to Surrogate’s Court Procedure Act § 1001, Surrogate’s Court properly denied petitioner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing object-ant’s claim against the estate. Petitioner did not make a prima facie showing that the prenuptial agreement she and the decedent signed was invalid and unenforceable insofar as it omitted a statement of the parties’ assets and liabilities. Notably, petitioner testified that she was aware when the agreement was executed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In Re the Estate of GreiffNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Panossian v. PanossianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ku v. Huey Min LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. DiPietro v. VatskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API