Legal Opinion

Goldwaters, Inc. v. Medar

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1957No. 6195PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Justice.

Suit by Alyce Medar against Gold-waters, Incorporated, for personal injuries claimed to have been caused by the effects of chemicals alleged to have been negligent ly applied by the agent of defendant in treating plaintiff’s hair in a beauty salon operated by defendant. From verdict and judgment for the plaintiff and the denial of defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. or in the alternative for a new trial, defendant appeals and presents six■ assignments of error. The entire argument in defendant’s brief is addressed to only one assignment and under the authority of Stallcup…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. McNeelyArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Stallcup v. CoscarartArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Lamfrom's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Dyer v. DyerArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Wrenn v. Vincent Et Vincent of Langley, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API