Legal Opinion

Harris v. RUSSELL PETROLEUM CORP.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 6, 2010No. 2090243PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Karen Harris (“the dependent”) appeals from the judgment of the Montgomery Circuit Court in favor of Russell Petroleum Corporation (“the employer”), denying the dependent’s claim for death benefits that she had brought pursuant to the provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”), codified at Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-1 et seq. We reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

Eddie Harris (“the employee”) worked for the employer as a fuel-delivery driver from the late 1980s until his death in 2008. In 2001, the employee injured his right knee, and, in 2002, the employee injured his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DyessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Ex Parte PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Hammons v. Roses Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. New River Coal Co. v. FilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Washington County School District v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Mobile Airport Authority v. EtheredgeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Wash. Co. Sch. Dist. v. Lbr Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API