Legal Opinion
Holcomb v. O'Rourke
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In consolidated proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the County of Westchester to reinstate the petitioners to their positions of employment, Andrew O’Rourke, Anthony Giambruno, and the County of Westchester appeal, by permission and as limited by their brief, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered September 26, 1997, as certified and described a class of former employees of the County of Westchester entitled to reinstatement and back pay as a result of the abolishment of their positions of employment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rivers v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rivera v. TrimarcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Martin v. LavineNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ammon v. Suffolk CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Globe Surgical Supply v. GEICO InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Tosner v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Graves v. DoarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- McGrath v. Suffolk CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024