Legal Opinion

Sandoval v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1926No. 10423PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The record before us shows an indictment charging appellant with transporting intoxicating liquor, and the verdict of a jury finding him guilty and assessing his punishment at one year in the penitentiary. If judgment was ever entered on the verdict, or if sentence was ever passed on appellant, the record fails to show it. Final judgment is a prerequisite to appeal. Washington v. State, 91 Tex.Crim. Rep.,240 S.W. 542. See also notes under Art. 796, Vernon's Ann. C. C. P., Vol. 3 (1925). The record contains a motion for new trial but fails to show that it was ever acted on by the court or that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Parish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Casey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Coats v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Peoples v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API