Sandoval v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The record before us shows an indictment charging appellant with transporting intoxicating liquor, and the verdict of a jury finding him guilty and assessing his punishment at one year in the penitentiary. If judgment was ever entered on the verdict, or if sentence was ever passed on appellant, the record fails to show it. Final judgment is a prerequisite to appeal. Washington v. State, 91 Tex.Crim. Rep.,240 S.W. 542. See also notes under Art. 796, Vernon's Ann. C. C. P., Vol. 3 (1925). The record contains a motion for new trial but fails to show that it was ever acted on by the court or that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Parish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Casey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Coats v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Peoples v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.