Legal Opinion

Stickney v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2000No. 98-2445PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*505The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Moore v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Littrell v. WigglesworthOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Stickney v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Littrell v. WigglesworthOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Alrjub v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Alrjub v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API