Legal Opinion

Bates v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 11, 1978PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant in a case submitted upon an "agreed statement of facts.” The plaintiff, a beneficiary of two life insurance policies on the life of her son (insured) issued by the defendant, seeks to recover double indemnity under the accidental death provisions of the policies. The insured was killed in the crash of a rented plane which he was piloting. Recovery is excluded under those provisions if the accidental death results from "[tjravel, flight or descent in or from any kind of aircraft... which the [ijnsured is aboard to perform specific duties…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. VAPPI & CO. INC. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Ober v. National Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. MacArthur v. Massachusetts Hospital Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. Cormier v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Hyfer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  2. Slater v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Arbeitman v. Monumental Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Utica Mutual Insurance v. FontneauMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Kates v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API