Legal Opinion

Bourgette v. Williams

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Benzie. (Aldrich, J.) Proceedings to establish a lien for labor upon certain shingles. Owners of shingles bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

These two eases were heard as one case in the circuit court for Benzie county, and are proceedings under Act No. 229, Laws of 1887, being “ An act establishing a lien for labor and services upon lumber, shingles,” etc. All the proceedings for the enforcement of these liens are admitted to be regular, and according to law. It is also admitted that the labor was performed and not paid for, and that it is such work as under the law would entitle all the lienors, with one exception, to the benefit of the statute. At the hearing in the court below the court found the facts in both cases in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crippen v. MorrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Mundy v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Bronson v. NewberryMichigan Supreme Court · 1845

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrews & Johnson Co. v. AtwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bailey Ornamental Iron Co. v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Common Council v. Board of AssessorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API