Legal Opinion

Cleveland Municipal School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2005No. 2003-0804PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} The question presented by this appeal is whether the Cuyahoga County Board of Revision (“BOR”) had jurisdiction over a complaint filed on June 27, 2000, to revise property valuations for a Cleveland office building for the tax years 1997 and 1998. We conclude that it did not. There is no statutory provision for such a complaint; appellant’s proposed extension of Columbus Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 305, 720 N.E.2d 517, to claim a continuation of an earlier complaint is unwarranted; and miseommunication of the type seen here can instead be resolved…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oberlin Manor, Ltd. v. Lorain County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Columbus Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. AERC Saw Mill Village, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Fogg-Akron Associates, L.P. v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. 1495 Jaeger L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Sheldon Road Associates, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API