Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO v. STATE Ex OAK HILL FIRE BRICK AND COAL CO

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1933No. 107Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By KUNKLE, J.

A determination of this question depends upon whether the bond sued upon is controlled by the provisions of §§2314, 2315, and 2316 GC, or whether the same is controlled by the provisions of §§2365-1-2-3, etc. GC. Counsel for plaintiff concede that if the ease is controlled by the provisions of §§2365-1-2-3, etc, GC, then certain jurisdictional facts required by such sections are not stated in the petition and the demurrer should have been sustained. Counsel for defendant surety company upon the other hand, with equal frankness, admit that if the case is controlled by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. State Office Building CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API