Legal Opinion
Cobb County v. McColister
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 20, 1992No. S91A1309, S91A1311PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Justice.
Following the trial court’s award under 42 USC § 1983 1 of $18,741 in attorney fees, expenses of litigation and costs to appellee in a zoning case, appellants filed both a direct appeal and an application for discretionary review, which we granted. Appellants’ direct appeal (S91A1309) is dismissed because judgments in zoning cases are not directly appealable (Trend Dev. Corp. v. Douglas County, 259 Ga. 425 (1) (383 SE2d 123) (1989)), and we address the merits of the appeal brought pursuant to the grant of discretionary review (S91A1311).
After the Cobb County Board of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Trend Development Corp. v. Douglas CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Suhadolnik v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Jack v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Lake Forest Chateau, Inc. v. City of Lake ForestIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by11 opinions
- Recycle & Recover, Inc. v. Georgia Board of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Diversified Holdings, LLP v. City of SuwaneeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- SMD, L.L.P. v. City of RoswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Prime Home Properties, LLC v. Rockdale County Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Dover v. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.