Legal Opinion
State v. Crumpton
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 20, 1998No. 20206-9-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
952 P.2d 1100 (1998)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Lindsey L. CRUMPTON, Appellant.
No. 20206-9-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
February 6, 1998.
Publication Ordered March 20, 1998.
Peter Thomas Connick Attorney, Seattle, for Appellant.
Pamela Beth Loginsky, Kitsap Co. Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Port Orchard, for Respondent.
ARMSTRONG, Judge.
Lindsey L. Crumpton appeals the superior court's denial of his motion for new trial or relief from judgment on grounds of newly discovered evidence. Agreeing with the trial court that Crumpton did not show good cause for failing to raise the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lambrix v. SingletarySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Matter of Personal Restraint of RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. MacKWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re the Personal Restraint of JeffriesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- In re the Personal Restraint of BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Personal Restraint Petition of VazquezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- In Re BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State of Washington v. Olajide Adel FletcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021