Legal Opinion
In Re Osborn
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 30, 1994No. 14-80595PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TOM R. CORNISH, Bankruptcy Judge.
On the 7th day of December, 1994, the Motion to Direct Turnover of Property of the Estate Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 542 and Bankruptcy Rule 1019(4) filed by the Trustee, and the Debtors’ Objection to Trustee’s Motion to Direct Turnover of Property and Brief in Support of Objection came on for hearing. Counsel appearing in person were Kenneth G.M. Mather, Trustee; Keith J. Hocker for the Debtors; and Joe Stamper for Richard Lerblance.
After a review of the above-referenced pleadings and hearing arguments of counsel, this Court does hereby enter the following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re O.J. OSBORN and Roma Lou Osborn, Debtors. O.J. OSBORN and Roma Lou Osborn, Appellants, v. DURANT BANK & TRUST COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Haney v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Erwin v. FrazierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Hickman v. First State Bank of Cordele (In Re Motley)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1981
- Collins v. Federal Land Bank of OmahaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm Life Insurance v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997