Legal Opinion

Caylus v. New York, Kingston & Syracuse Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1875PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

There is no allegation in the complaint that the defendants,-of whom redress is claimed in this action, or either of them, personally made any representations to the plaintiffs with respect to the bonds in question.

Whatever specific statements or representations were made proceeded from William B. Litchfield, who was acting for *101E. C. & E. B. Litchfield, and which were that they would deliver to the plaintiffs as collateral security for the payment of certain notes, given for iron sold and delivered, first mortgage bonds of the New York, Kingston and Syracuse Railroad Company, at sixty-six per…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Union Central Life Insurance v. SchidlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API