Legal Opinion

Watrous v. Borner

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 5, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-597 (JCH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES (Doc. No. 174)

JANET C. HALL, District Judge.

This case concerns a cease-and-desist order recorded on a parcel of land in Preston, Connecticut (the “Property”) owned by plaintiff Kenneth H. Watrous. Although other defendants and claims were previously involved in the case, on March 18, 2013, the case proceeded to trial on a single substantive due process claim against four named individuals. On March 22, 2013, the jury found that three of the four — Kent D. Borner, John A. Moulson, and Robert M. Congdon (collectively, the “Judgment defendants”)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. LeBlanc-Sternberg v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. WolfsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Blanding v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  3. Hudson Furniture, Inc. v. MizrahiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  4. Johnson v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
  5. Sun Capital Partners III, LP v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension FundDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API