Legal Opinion

ALLMAN v. United States

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided May 6, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00539Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION RONDELL ALLMAN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 1:22-cv-00539-JPH-TAB ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER DENYING

28 U.S.C. § 2255

MOTION AS UNTIMELY Petitioner Rondell Allman pleaded guilty to and was sentenced for a drug conspiracy offense. While serving his sentence, he moved to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues that his attorney was constitutionally ineffective for failing to challenge a sentencing enhancement. The United States seeks dismissal of the §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Deangelo Whiteside v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API