Legal Opinion

Denning v. Bailey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1924PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

A will takes effect on the death of the testator. The beneficiaries of the will take the property under the condition it is in at the death of the testator. If the land involved in this appeal, or its proceeds was personal property at the death of the testatrix, then it remained so through the administration of her estate. Nothing that the administrator with the will annexed could do in the course of administration could change the nature of that property: 28 R. C. L. 60, § 4, note 4; In re Estate of Bernhard, Deceased, 134 Iowa, 603 (112 N. W. 86, 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1029); 40 Cyc. 1074,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DwyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Potter Realty Co. v. DerbyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Mitchell v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Wollgast v. HenningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Wittick v. MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Eilermann's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Kern v. RobertsonMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. In Re the Estate of FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API