Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 30, 1988No. C 87-09-34907; CA A47075PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for escape in the second degree. ORS 162.155. She argues that the trial court should have granted her motion for acquittal, because she did not leave or fail to return to a “correctional facility.” We affirm.

On August 14, 1987, defendant was convicted of two counts of loitering to solicit prostitution. The court sentenced her on each charge to “Jail 180 Days,” with “Work Release [- Our] New Beginnings” as a “condition.” The sentences were to run consecutively. Defendant was incarcerated at that time. On August 24, 1987, she was transferred to Our New…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TorgersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State v. SchafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API