State v. Scott
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
Defendant appeals her conviction for escape in the second degree. ORS 162.155. She argues that the trial court should have granted her motion for acquittal, because she did not leave or fail to return to a “correctional facility.” We affirm.
On August 14, 1987, defendant was convicted of two counts of loitering to solicit prostitution. The court sentenced her on each charge to “Jail 180 Days,” with “Work Release [- Our] New Beginnings” as a “condition.” The sentences were to run consecutively. Defendant was incarcerated at that time. On August 24, 1987, she was transferred to Our New…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. TorgersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. SchafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993