Legal Opinion

Rhodus v. Goins

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 9, 1924No. 11534PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an appeal from a decree of Judge Memminger foreclosing two mortgages. The exceptions, 13 in number, challenge the correctness of his Honor’s findings of fact, and as to the amount found due on the two mortgages. This Court has held that where the referee and Circuit Judge concur in their findings of fact, it is incumbent upon the appellant to satisfy this Court that such concurrent findings are without testimony to support them, or obviously against the preponderance of the evidence. In this case the appellant has satisfied us…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ellis v. MasonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  2. Tate v. LenhardtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1818

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. KerrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  2. Harmon v. Bank of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API