Pace v. Bartles
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On exceptions to a master’s report upon exceptions to an answer for insufficiency.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The complainant’s bill alleges that Michael Pace died on the 1st of January, 1877, leaving a will by which he devised to his son George a farm of one hundred and eighty-seven acres, worth about $10,000, and then encumbered by a judgment for one thousand and some odd dollars, which Elias M. Bartles had recovered in 1876 against both Michael and George Pace in the supreme court of this State, upon which executions had issued. The complainant, George Pace, was appointed executor of the-will, and the defendant, Bartles, was a witness to it. A caveat against the probate of the will…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Phillips v. PrevostNew York Court of Chancery · 1819
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944