Legal Opinion

Pace v. Bartles

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On exceptions to a master’s report upon exceptions to an answer for insufficiency.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The complainant’s bill alleges that Michael Pace died on the 1st of January, 1877, leaving a will by which he devised to his son George a farm of one hundred and eighty-seven acres, worth about $10,000, and then encumbered by a judgment for one thousand and some odd dollars, which Elias M. Bartles had recovered in 1876 against both Michael and George Pace in the supreme court of this State, upon which executions had issued. The complainant, George Pace, was appointed executor of the-will, and the defendant, Bartles, was a witness to it. A caveat against the probate of the will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phillips v. PrevostNew York Court of Chancery · 1819

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API