Waller v. Hughes
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from the County Court in and for the County of Pima. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtShields, C. J.
This case is submitted on the facts stated in the complaint. Two questions are before the court for decision: First. Whether, under the laws of Arizona, mining claims, for which patents have been issued by the United States, are taxable at all, or for any purpose. Second. Should it be decided that such mining claims are taxable, was there any legal or valid assessment of taxes on the mining claims of the plaintiff, the respondent herein, for the year A. D. 1885?
The portions of the complaint which raise these questions are the following: “That the plaintiff, at all the time hereinafter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Philadelphia and Wilmington Railroad Co. v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- State v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Atlantic & Pacific Railroad v. LesueurArizona Supreme Court · 1888
- County of Cochise v. Copper Queen Consolidated Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1903
- McKenzie v. CanningUtah Supreme Court · 1913
- Alexander v. ShermanArizona Supreme Court · 1887
- Hillman v. Flagstaff Community HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.