Legal Opinion

Sardell v. Malanio

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 27, 1967No. 35830PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

202 So.2d 746 (1967)

Nicholas C. SARDELL and Marie H. Sardell, His Wife, Petitioners,

v.

Gary MALANIO, Respondent.

No. 35830.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 27, 1967.

Frates, Fay, Floyd & Pearson and Larry S. Stewart, Miami, for petitioners.

Weinstein & Weissenborn, Miami, for respondent.

THORNAL, Justice.

By petition for certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District because of an alleged conflict with a prior decision of this Court on the same point of law.

Our problem involves a consideration of the doctrine of proximate cause as affected by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rodi v. Florida Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Loftin v. McCrainieSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. Broome v. Budget Rent-A-Car of Jax, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Sardell v. MalanioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Stahl v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Greene v. FlewellingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Brandeis v. FelcherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  5. Rolando P. Ruiz, etc. v. Tenet Hialeah Healthsystem, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API