Richards v. Richman
Superior Court of Delaware
Foreign Attachment Case The facts appear in the charge of the Court below, and in the opinion of Supreme Court following same.
1Opinion of the Court
Pennewill, J.,
charging the jury:
Gentlemen of the jury:—This is an action brought by Walter S. Richards, the plaintiff, against Gideon Richman and Walter D. Prouse, trading as Richman and Prouse, the defendants, for the recovery of the sum of $1490.50, claimed to be due and owing from *560the defendants for services rendered by the plaintiff in the month of March, 1903.
The plaintiff, a real estate broker of the city of Philadelphia, claims that on or about March 9th or 10th, 1903, he secured or arranged a meeting between the defendants and the Landlith Improvement Company or its representative,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sweeney v. Ten Mile Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Hipple v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Reed's Executors v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Seabury v. Fidelity Insurance Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Gibson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McGilvray v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937