Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Forrester

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 1997No. 83 0045; CA A88235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Mother initiated this proceeding to establish and collect from father a child support arrearage. The principal issue is whether father and mother agreed that, in lieu of father paying mother child support as required by their dissolution judgment, father would pay mother’s credit card obligations, and, if so, whether their agreement is enforceable. An administrative law judge (ALJ) held that such agreements are not enforceable unless reflected in a modification of the dissolution judgment by the court, and he established father’s arrearage accordingly. The trial court reversed and credited…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Starzinger v. StarzingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Sheldon v. SheldonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. In re the Marriage of GrageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. In re the Marriage of WyllieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Grage v. GrageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. T.M. v. L.H.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  2. In re the Marriage of ForresterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API