Legal Opinion
Altamont Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 23, 1996No. 91-1369, 93-1241, 93-1295, 93-1308, 93-1309 and 93-1317PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission authorized petitioner Pacific Gas Transmission to build and operate a pipeline from the Canadian border to the Oregon-California border at Malin, Oregon, where it connects to the intrastate facilities of PGT’s parent, Pacific Gas & Electric. The Califor nia Public Utilities Commission, also a petitioner, authorized PG&E to expand its facilities in order to receive the new gas from PGT for distribution within California.
Because it determined that the rate structure proposed by PGT-PG&E discriminated against interstate shippers…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Comm'n of Kan.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Texaco Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- South Coast Air Quality Management District v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Electric Power Supply Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Destec Energy, Inc. v. Southern California Gas Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- Pub Util Cmsn CA v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.