Legal Opinion
Smith v. McIntosh
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1936No. 32335PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
On the 25th day of May, 1935, W. H. White executed a warranty deed conveying to the appellant, S. L. Smith, certain lots in the city of Gulfport. This deed recited a cash consideration of fifty dollars, and was acknowledged before J. W. Savage, United States commissioner for the Southern District of Mississippi, and was filed for record on the same day that it was executed. Three days Idler, for a valuable consideration, the said W. H. White conveyed the same lots to the appellee, L. K. McIntosh, by warranty deed acknowledged before a notary public; aiid this deed was duly filed for record.
On…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Chin Bak Kan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. AllredSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Sing Tuck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- In re Sing TuckU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- Metropolitan National Bank, James M. Oberlies and Robert E. Ryan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Mills v. Damson Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Grand Oaks, Inc. v. Cumberland Management Group, Inc. (In re Cumberland Management Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2000
- Mills v. Damson Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982