Estate v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
New York Supreme Court
Action for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtNewburger, J.
Plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendants from relocating or reconstructing the columns supporting the elevated structure along the Bowery on the sidewalks of the blocks, on which plaintiff’s property fronts. Plaintiff is the owner of certain lands and buildings thereon situated on the west side of the Bowery, in this borough, about seventy^ seven feet four inches north of Grand street, being about fifty-three feet three inches front, and known by the street Nos. 138, 140 and 142 Bowery; and also the property on the east side of the Bowery, sixty-two feet north of Broome street, about…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rensselaer and Saratoga R.R. Co. v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Eels v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Knox v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890
- Village of Canandaigua v. BenedictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Gray v. York State Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Callahan Estate v. Manhattan Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915