Legal Opinion
Canty v. Fischer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 9, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1056We affirm. Initially, we find no merit to petitioner’s claim that he was improperly removed from the hearing inasmuch as he became disruptive and continued to raise issues previously addressed by the Hearing Officer despite the Hearing Officer’s numerous warnings that he would be removed from the hearing if he continued to engage in such conduct (see Matter of Bunting v Fischer, 85 AD3d 1473, 1474 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 712 [2011]; Matter of Jackson v Fischer, 59 AD3d 820, 820-821 [2009]). Significantly, petitioner was not removed from the hearing until after all of the evidence had been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scott v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Bunting v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- McLean v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Jackson v. FisCherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kalwasinski v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rupnarine v. PrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Dorcinvil v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of Bonds v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Rupnarine v. PrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014