Legal Opinion

Sharon B. Pollard, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 26, 2000No. 98-6317, 98-6319, 99-5125PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

Sharon Pollard and her husband brought this action against her employer, DuPont, for “continuing harassment based on her sex since 1987” under Title VII, as well as the common law injuries of intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent supervision, and loss of consortium. The district court found that she was subjected to co-worker hostile work environment sexual harassment, that her DuPont supervisors were well aware of the discrimination, and that it resulted in a medical leave of absence from her job for psychological assistance and her eventual…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Pollard v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Michelle Moody v. Atlantic City Board of EducatiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Giles v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Channon v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API