Breitling's Administrators v. Clarke & Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Marengo. Heard before the Hon. A. W. Dillabd.
1Opinion of the CourtB. F. Sapfold, J.
— The appellees filed their bill to enjoin the appellants, administrators with the will annexed of Gotlieb Breitling, from prosecuting an action of ejectment against them, for the recovery of lands which had belonged to the decedent; and to obtain the specific performance of a contract for the sale of the lands, made between the testator and *451his son, Alfred Breitling, whose right they had acquired. The heirs-at-law and devisees of the decedent were also made parties defendant. The material facts, which were either admitted or established by proof, may be briefly stated as follows : On the 1st…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitworth's Distributees v. OliverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1864
- Brewer v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Bogle v. Bogle's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Cummings' Heirs v. Gill's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
- Purdom v. TiptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bentley v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Parks v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Gordon v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1894