Legal Opinion

Sage Club v. Hunt

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1981No. 5532PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Appellant, The Sage Club, appeals a judgment entered against it in a lawsuit arising out of an altercation between a bartender employed at the club, Mr. Thyfault, and a customer, appellee David Leland Hunt. The trial court entered a default judgment against Mr. Thyfault and held The Sage Club liable under the theories of respondeat superior and negligence in continuing to employ Mr. Thyfault. Appellant asserts that it cannot be held liable for the intentional tort of its employee because the tort was personal to Mr. Thyfault and was not within the scope of employment.

We affirm.

I

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riviello v. WaldronNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Stockwell v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Combined Insurance Co. of America v. SinclairWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Miller v. Reiman-Wuerth Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Jones v. HerrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jung-Leonczynska v. SteupWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Condict v. CondictWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Worman v. BP America Production Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. ANDERSON VS. MANDALAY CORP. C/W 61871Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  5. ANDERSON VS. MANDALAY CORP. C/W 61871Nevada Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API