Legal Opinion

Earl v. Marcus

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 23, 1979No. 79-630PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ appeal from the order of the circuit court for a new trial. The motion is granted.

The plaintiffs commenced this action in 1974 for false imprisonment. November 8,1978 the jury awarded plaintiffs compensatory and punitive damages totalling $25,000. The trial court found that the awards were excessive and gave the plaintiffs the option of accepting reduced damages in amounts the court found to be reasonable or a new trial. Section 805.15(6), Stats., provides:

If a trial court determines that a verdict is excessive or inadequate, not due to perversity or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In re the Promulgation of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lucas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Superior Court of Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Pella Farmers Mutual Insurance v. Hartland Richmond Town InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wick v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wellens v. Kahl Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  3. Bearns v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  4. Grulkowski v. State, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  5. Wick v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API