City of San Antonio v. Poulos
Texas Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
POPE, Justice.
I respectfully dissent. The Commission ruled that the charges lodged against of*146ficer Poulos were sufficient and that he had violated these rules set out in the charges:
“RULE XX, Section 120. Neglect of duty;
Failure or refusal to carry out instructions;
Violation of any of the rules and regulations of the department.
1. That portion of Rule 16 which provides :
‘Officers shall report promptly * * * all information they may receive about any violation or suspected violation.’
2. That portion of Rule 29 which provides :
‘No member of the Department shall willfully…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fire Department v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund Trustees v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Sullivan v. Municipal Court of the Roxbury DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- City of Evansville v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
- Sudduth v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.