Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of San Antonio v. Poulos

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1967No. A-11543Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

POPE, Justice.

I respectfully dissent. The Commission ruled that the charges lodged against of*146ficer Poulos were sufficient and that he had violated these rules set out in the charges:

“RULE XX, Section 120. Neglect of duty;

Failure or refusal to carry out instructions;

Violation of any of the rules and regulations of the department.

1. That portion of Rule 16 which provides :

‘Officers shall report promptly * * * all information they may receive about any violation or suspected violation.’

2. That portion of Rule 29 which provides :

‘No member of the Department shall willfully…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fire Department v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund Trustees v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Sullivan v. Municipal Court of the Roxbury DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. City of Evansville v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Sudduth v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API