Legal Opinion

Meenagh v. Dewey

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGoldrick, J.

This is an application by fourteen former employees of the district attorney of New York county, directing him to reinstate them, with salary due each from the date of what is termed their wrongful removal and discharge. The positions of the petitioners “ were abolished because after a survey it was found that they were unnecessary and useless, and for reasons of economy.” These were the reasons given by the district attorney in a communication to the State Department of Civil Service on January 4, 1938. Of the petitioners, Kissane, Succarato, Meenagh, Friob, Coll and McDermott are World war…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Breckenridge v. ScannellNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. People Ex Rel. Davison v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Edkins v. WotherspoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Pettis v. BreartonNew York Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cifarelli v. Village of BabylonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  2. Lewin v. LaGuardiaNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Pielsticker v. LivotiNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Meenagh v. DeweyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Meenagh v. DeweyNew York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API