Barker ex rel. Union National Bank v. Barth
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, on a promissory note. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charles G-. Neely, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
This is a suit to reverse a judgment in favor of defendant in error and against plaintiff in error. The action was assumpsit in the name of plaintiff in error, for the use of the Union National Bank of Chicago. The suit was on a promissory note made by defendant in error, of date May 1, 1892, for the sum of $5,000, payable on or before May 1, 1895, to the order of S. B. Barker, with interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum. The defendant pleaded, as a set-off, a note made by the plaintiff, of date March 16,1893, for the sum of $4,573.94, payable to the order of McElwee & Carney, with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morris v. CheneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Walter v. KirkIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
- Union National Bank v. HinesIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Smith v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Farber v. National Forge & Iron Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bradley v. Illinois Automobile Insurance ExchangeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
- McPherson v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
- Miller v. StanleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
- Cox v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of HartfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
- Tregoning v. TregoningAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931